Skip to Main Content

WSO2 vs Red Hat: Discover the best solution for your business

WSO2 vs Red Hat

Both WSO2 and Red Hat offer integration solutions for companies. In this article, we’ll compare the various features of WSO2 Micro Integrator VS Red Hat Integrator to help you decide which one best suits your business needs.

We’ll cover the following points:

  1. What is WSO2?
    1. Development
    2. Characteristics
    3. Deployment
  2. What is Red Hat Integration?
    1. Development
    2. Characteristics
    3. Deployment
  3. Comparison between WSO2 Micro Integrator vs Red Hat Integration
    1. Key differences between WSO2 Micro Integrator vs Red Hat Integration

1. What is WSO2?

WSO2 provides open-source technology software for integration, APIs and Identity Management. WSO2 and Chakray have worked side by side for many years, producing impressive results for several major companies.

If you’re on the lookout for an API or Identity Management solution, then WSO2 has to be among your top choices. Not only does it have a proven track record, it also offers stability and a wide variety of features. The same can be said for WSO2 API Manager and WSO2 Identity Server.

However, when it comes to integrations, WSO2 offers us its WSO2 Micro Integrator. This is an upgraded version of its Legacy Enterprise Integrator tool.

1.1 Development

The core is still Java based in terms of development. That said, WSO2 relies on XML for developing the code for integrations. It also has a visual tool, Integration Studio, which delivers a growing number of development and deployment upgrades. This remains a barrier to entry for inexperienced developers.

1.2 Characteristics

WSO2 includes a number of artifacts to implement the various integration patterns. These offer reliability and broad coverage to implement the necessary developments.

In addition, WSO2 has an extensive list of connectors that facilitate integration with other widely used external systems, such as: Salesforce, Azure, or AWS.

1.3 Deployment

Depending on the size and number of integrations, we can distinguish between different types of micro integrator implantation patterns:

  • Developing integrations as microservices and deploying them via containers and, previous to this, creating an image containing the Micro Integrator and our integration.
  • Developing integrating applications, packaging them as C-App files and deploying them using a Micro Integrator which is also deployed in server mode.

2. What is Red Hat Integration?

Red Hat is a multinational provider of open-source software solutions for business. It has an extensive portfolio of solutions which include: Cloud Services, Cloud Computing, Infrastructure, Integration, API Development, and Automation and Management.

It’s a well-established company that has evolved significantly in recent years by expanding its catalogue of services and investing in Open-Source software. Their expert team can help us with pretty much anything and everything we need.

When it comes to integrations, Red Hat Integration comprises a comprehensive framework of tools offering multiple solutions. However, if our main focus is the creation of services, then Red Hat Fuse is the tool for us. Red Hat still relies on Apache Camel and Quarkus-based solutions to develop our services.

2.1 Development

As we mentioned, they provide us with Apache Camel solutions but with the support of a company like Red Hat.

Therefore, the applications are developed in Java. For this reason, we have a number of tools that can help us when we’re creating our code. This helps to smooth the learning curve.

We can develop our integrations using three different technologies:

  • Camel 3 with Spring Boot. Using one of the most powerful frameworks.
  • Camel extensions for Quarkus. Relying on the powerful native Kubernetes stack based.
  • Camel K. Enabling serverless integrations.

2.2 Details

Red Hat leverages widely used Java frameworks, enabling us to develop highly robust applications.

Apache Camel features basic components for the application of integration patterns. It also has a variety of components that facilitate connections with a multitude of external systems.

2.3 Deployment

Technology aside, the development of our services is clearly geared towards cloud-oriented deployment. Thanks to the Source to Image methodology, we can create images that contain our application code and deploy them using the container technology of our choice.

And in order to manage all the tasks associated with deployment, orchestration, etc. Red Hat offers a wide range of services. These include Linux images, OpenShift for container orchestration, Ansible support, and task automation assistance.

Still not sure which solution best suits your company? Contact us and we’ll help you find the best tool for your business

3. Comparison between WSO2 Micro Integrator and Red Hat Integration

When you first started reading this article, you were probably wondering: Is WSO2 better than Red Hat? Why should I choose one tool over the other?

Technical language aside, when it comes to development, WSO2 has a clear disadvantage, especially if there are inexperienced developers involved. The size of our developments and our deployment methodology are the key factors on which our decision should be based.

Both WSO2 and Red Hat implement the integration patterns that allow us to successfully deliver our services and developments. They also feature connectors or components that facilitate integration to other systems. And if that wasn’t enough, they are both highly rated and fully supported by the manufacturer. So, what exactly are the differences between them?

3.1 Key differences between WSO2 Micro Integrator and Red Hat Integration

The following summary table highlights some of the key differences between WSO2 Micro Integrator and Red Hat Integration:

Red Hat

Integration

WSO2 Micro

Integrator

Microservices deployment Yes Yes
Deployment as a centralized ESB No Yes
API Management No Yes
Programming language Java, XML, and YAML XML
Cloud-based deployment tools Yes No
Business support Yes Yes
Inventory of connectors Yes Yes
API Management support products Yes Yes
Container technology support products Yes No
Cloud deployment support products Yes No

It’s important to note that both WSO2 and Red Hat offer a wide variety of products and services. This table provides a general overview of some of the key differences between these two companies. Ultimately, the choice between these two providers depends on the specific needs of your business and the requirements of the project itself.

Conclusion

WSO2 Micro Integrator and Red Hat Integration are both extremely powerful integration solutions with a lot to offer. WSO2 Micro Integrator is known for its usability and simplicity. Meanwhile, Red Hat Integrator was created for enterprise-level deployment sand offers a wide range of features. The choice between the two will depend on your specific needs and requirements.

  • If you’re looking to focus on microservices or agile methodologies with cloud-based deployment models, then Red Hat Integration is for you.
  • If you prefer a more traditional approach, which involves developing, packaging, and deploying to an on-premise or cloud-based server, and which also comes with a great management API that gives you greater control over the deployed packages, WSO2 has your name on it.

Whichever option you choose, WSO2 vs Red hat,  the expert team at Chakray will be on hand to help and support you and your team. We offer ad-hoc solutions for each and every stage of development and we’re also official Red Hat and WSO2 partners. Contact us today and we’ll help you get the best technology solutions for your business.